Le 14/06/2015 16:31, Johannes Löthberg a écrit : > On 14/06, Johannes Löthberg wrote: >> On 14/06, Reventlov wrote: >>>> In which way is it cleaner and more structured? It's a bash hack >>>> instead of actually using properly structured and supported features. >>>> >>> >>> Please take this not-a-bug https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/43714 in >>> consideration, too. >>> >>> It's why i'm not using this structure, personnally: if I did, i'd have >>> to use unique names for each architecture dependant source, and change >>> my package function and/or my build function to take thoses unique >>> names into account. >>> >>> A bash hack inside a bash script is not this bad. >>> >> >> I don't see how that is relevant anymore since the AUR doesn't use >> sourceballs anymore. >> > > And it will also make it not show up in the AUR properly since the > sources won't be parsed properly. >
I’m not sure to understand you. How would you package this one for instance: https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/chromium-pepper-flash-standalone/ ? Bruno
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
