* Ralf Mardorf <[email protected]> [2015-05-31 13:52:04 +0200]: > I have to revise my claim "it _absolutely_ doesn't belong to the > comments". I guess it's ok to ask some usage questions by a comment too, > but as already pointed out, less people might notice a comment and to > many usage requests by a comment would be bad.
I actually agree with you here. > Questions regarding software from AUR are unwanted on Arch general, so > in the past several subscribers send requests regarding usage of > software from AUR to AUR general. I wasn't aware of that (I'm not reading arch-general). I'd have said it belongs there, but I might be wrong then. Sorry! > Yes, the forums are a place were it's allowed to ask. So we've got no > mailing list for requests regarding usage of software from AUR? > > Users could subscribe to each mailing list of the software they are > using, but then we need to subscribe to hundreds of mailing lists. > > I'm subscribed to the mailing lists of software I often use, but > palemoon is something I installed for testing purpose. > > IMO there should be a mailing list for requests regarding software, if > the fine manual doesn't answer a question. Indeed. As said I felt like arch-general is that place, apparently it's not (I happen to disagree with that, though). It seems like others agree aur-general isn't either... So what is? I don't know. Florian -- http://www.the-compiler.org | [email protected] (Mail/XMPP) GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/
pgp0roKU5rb94.pgp
Description: PGP signature
