How the heck do I unsubscribe?  I want off this list!

-------- Original Message --------
From: [email protected]
Apparently from: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: aur-general Digest, Vol 116, Issue 47
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:20:17 -0400

> Send aur-general mailing list submissions to
>       [email protected]
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       [email protected]
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       [email protected]
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of aur-general digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Registration Doesn't work (John Robson)
>    2. Re: Registration Doesn't work (Jens Adam)
>    3. Re: Registration Doesn't work (Florian Pritz)
>    4. python-rst2beamer (sinma)
>    5. Re: python-rst2beamer (Jeremy Audet)
>    6. Re: python-rst2beamer (Jeremy Audet)
>    7. Re: New mailing list for AUR requests (delete, merge, orphan,
>       ..) (Stefan Husmann)
>    8. Anonymous comments in the AUR (Karol Blazewicz)
>    9. Re: Anonymous comments in the AUR (WorMzy Tykashi)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:50:53 -0400
> From: John Robson <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] Registration Doesn't work
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> I asked them about this problem.
> 
> They need the Domain or IP of the Mail Server that is sending that message.
> 
> And (maybe can help), what's the sender email?
> 
> Thank you,
> John
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
> 
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTrHmdAAoJEOjf7XlrDgBAv5UH/1jkzEnmnjxsEiVHiTIcMqjY
> Ff1HOumFChufTw10F/PTyWtiI0n1BUSD7GQrqyL5S9m1D9df59AmVudbz9txgnlb
> cmoKrocxphAgXsjI4Rqu8oGqs+R8fOfFkj5GtGxzn0hw8nfNs8hqO9HkyUt7N1wL
> Rsuglke04oWQAeSzcmDXGvXAlp4KD6B99IgqSnGBJvS6xOD6WNeYS/A0kiRwUntj
> 60gG/mkz/rEzSHH6e8IcPLhsX2+tz5HbaOOl9RW9Pi94ZHpKcDqrJgkLboTq2lev
> oNNw7+Ap9F3vyA+kdKt8OsWssLCo9gjJmaDTR08tFyhN6XVnYfkHu53Ynuphf8M=
> =EPnT
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 22:21:09 +0200
> From: Jens Adam <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] Registration Doesn't work
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:50:53 -0400
> John Robson <[email protected]>:
> 
> > They need the Domain or IP of the Mail Server that is sending that
> > message.
> > 
> > And (maybe can help), what's the sender email?
> 
> Well, look in your mail headers ...
> 
> Host/IP is gerolde.archlinux.org (66.211.214.132) and the sender is
> [email protected]
> 
> --byte
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 455 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: 
> <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20140626/ae75ecda/attachment-0001.asc>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 23:05:59 +0200
> From: Florian Pritz <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] Registration Doesn't work
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> On 26.06.2014 22:21, Jens Adam wrote:
> > Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:50:53 -0400
> > John Robson <[email protected]>:
> > 
> >> They need the Domain or IP of the Mail Server that is sending that
> >> message.
> >> 
> >> And (maybe can help), what's the sender email?
> > 
> > Well, look in your mail headers ...
> > 
> > Host/IP is gerolde.archlinux.org (66.211.214.132) and the sender is
> > [email protected]
> 
> That's only correct for mailing lists. AUR mails are sent from
> alderaan.archlinux.org.
> 
> Assuming they read [email protected] I can deal with this directly. They
> really should be reading that (as should everyone else), but in my
> experience if something goes wrong with email then postmaster is
> normally not configured or not read. So far I haven't received a reply,
> but I continue to have hope.
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 819 bytes
> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
> URL: 
> <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20140626/859f032b/attachment-0001.asc>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:37:40 +0200
> From: sinma <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [aur-general] python-rst2beamer
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> I guess the package name needs to be edited to python2-rst2beamer to
> conform to Arch package naming convention.
> 
> -- 
> mon site web: hack-libre.org
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 10:03:23 -0400
> From: Jeremy Audet <[email protected]>
> To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)"
>       <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] python-rst2beamer
> Message-ID:
>       <CA+A7n+htfmtjcvWve6tFXSMy=PLmEH3MHVNs=8nldxfmc6f...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> sinma,
> 
> rst2beamer appears to be intended for use by end users on the command line.
> [1] Thus, the package should be called "rst2beamer", not
> python{,2}-rst2beamer. The package should also install a simple wrapper
> script at /usr/bin/rst2beamer. There's a couple other issues with the
> package, too: variables are not properly quoted, "|| return 1" is included
> in the script, and an md5sums array is used instead of a sha256sums array.
> 
> Have you contacted the maintainer about this? They may be happy to upload a
> new package named rst2beamer with the appropriate fixes. If that is done, a
> merge request can be made to the new aur-requests mailing list.
> 
> ? Jeremy "Ichimonji10" Audet
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 10:04:03 -0400
> From: Jeremy Audet <[email protected]>
> To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)"
>       <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] python-rst2beamer
> Message-ID:
>       <CA+A7n+iD1NwM6ZKVm+BaCbNbqTY8fmVC=sfpa+xso-1p8rq...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> Ack. That [1] should have led to https://pypi.python.org/pypi/rst2beamer
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 7
> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 20:58:30 +0200
> From: Stefan Husmann <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] New mailing list for AUR requests (delete,
>       merge, orphan, ..)
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> 
> Am 25.06.2014 22:02, schrieb Florian Pritz:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As requested by Lukas, I've created a new mailing list for AUR related
> > requests such as deletion, merge or orphan requests.
> >
> > The AUR will soon feature a web interface to create such requests and
> > for history and discussion purposes mails will be sent to this new list.
> >
> > Please start using it for new requests already (maybe wait a couple
> > hours so TUs can subscribe). Discussion about anything apart from such
> > requests should stay on aur-general.
> >
> > You can subscribe here[1].
> >
> > [1]: https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-requests
> >
> > I expect traffic on aur-general to go down quite a lot due to this
> > change, so if you aren't subscribed because of this request traffic feel
> > free to give it another try now.
> >
> Hello,
> 
> I think this is worth an announcement on the news page on archlinux.org.
> 
> I felt free to do so on archlinux.de already.
> 
> https://bbs.archlinux.de/viewtopic.php?pid=325120#p325120
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> Stefan
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 8
> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 23:38:30 +0200
> From: Karol Blazewicz <[email protected]>
> To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)"
>       <[email protected]>
> Subject: [aur-general] Anonymous comments in the AUR
> Message-ID:
>       <CAO0v=moajoxuxvm7o2cs9qxw1vtr4ba955_27om+692876d...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> Are anonymous comments something new?
> 
> Usually they're pretty old https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lpairs/
> , the newest I stumbled upon is
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hydrogen-drumkits/
> 
> Were some users removed from the AUR db?
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 9
> Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 00:20:14 +0100
> From: WorMzy Tykashi <[email protected]>
> To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)"
>       <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] Anonymous comments in the AUR
> Message-ID:
>       <CALOYprWOEFDLOfAydBGq-a2T6su2+n0FCvSwb2tz0oq-A=5...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> On 27 June 2014 22:38, Karol Blazewicz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Are anonymous comments something new?
> >
> > Usually they're pretty old https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lpairs/
> > , the newest I stumbled upon is
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hydrogen-drumkits/
> >
> > Were some users removed from the AUR db?
> 
> Yep, a while ago [1]. Although the initial email suggest ste comments
> would be removed, this was revised later in the thread.
> 
> [1a] 
> https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2014-January/027030.html
> [1b] 
> https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2014-February/027039.html
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aur-general mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of aur-general Digest, Vol 116, Issue 47
> ********************************************

Reply via email to