On 2014-05-08 18:09 +0200 Nowaker wrote: >> 3) I think commenting about update will involve more people and bring >> awareness that the AUR package is active and not orphaned. > >This is true, but should not be implemented like that. That's good it >has been reverted. > >AUR could keep track of the updates, e.g. have a new field named >"Updates" that would list all versions and their release dates. It could >be expandable with a single click, so it doesn't clutter the interface.
The AUR lists the current version and the date of the last package modification. That is enough. You really don't need a full history of changes prior to the previous one. If you really want to follow package history for some reason, you can check out the AUR Git repo.
