On 06.12.2013 10:45, Sergej Pupykin wrote: > At Fri, 06 Dec 2013 09:42:11 +0001, > Maxime Gauduin <[email protected]> wrote: >> I would change that rule a bit, because wxgtk is a special case. The >> 2.9 branch is a devel branch, keeping wxgtk for the stable branch and >> adding a suffix for the devel branch makes sense. Speaking of wxgtk, >> now that 3.0.0 is out, we will most likely need to get rid of wxgtk29 >> and create a legacy wxgtk28 package. >> >> Anyway, imho the rule should be: use plain name for the latest stable >> release, and add the appropriate suffix (usually 1 or 2 digits) for any >> other release. > I prefer leave all things as is without any new rules. There are > packages that have multiple stable branches.
I went ahead and proposed a new rule because I also think this should be in the guidelines: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Talk:Arch_Packaging_Standards#Package_naming Comments? <https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Talk:Arch_Packaging_Standards#Package_naming>
