On Sunday 01 December 2013 22:17:28 nyuszika7h wrote: > On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 03:59:42PM -0500, Jeremy Audet wrote: > > Is the new .tar.gz file available at the same location? [1] I'm still > > getting the exact same set of files. > > I forgot to rebuild the source tarball. I've fixed that now. > > > Yes. The current PKGBUILD [2] lists a maintainer and two contributors. > > It's > > polite to list all three of them in the new PKGBUILD as contributors. > > Oh, I didn't notice there's a package for sic in the AUR already. The > wiki says not to create duplicate packages. Should I contact the current > maintainer about it? (I've updated the PKGBUILD to list them as > contributors.)
The original package [1] is out-of-date. If you want to maintain the package you must contact with its current maintainer first via email and wait for a reply for a two week [1]. After this if he doens't reply you may send a disown request to this mailing list. However, if he reply that he will maintain this package you may suggest him your PKGBUILD. In this case YOU will be contributor. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sic [2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR#Other_requests -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: [email protected] ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
