On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:35:27 +0200 Jelle van der Waa <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02/04/13 17:59, Jonathan Arnold wrote: > > There are 2 packages for the Copy.com client software package: > > > > copy - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy/ > > copy-agent - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy-agent/ > > > > I think both have PKGBUILD problems, from dependencies (the Copy.com > > software uses Qt4, not Gtk, for instance) to poorly formed PKGBUILDs > > (one has just a package() method and one has just a build() method). > > I'm not really sure how this should be resolved, mostly because I > > wouldn't pick one over the other right now. > > > > Any one with more PKGBUILD confidence want to step in? > > > > Also, if you're interested, sign up with this link and we both get > > an extra 5gb(!) of cloud storage on copy.com: > > > > https://copy.com?r=NXWnIn > > > Imo the 'copy' package is perfectly fine. The other package installs > in /opt which isn't needed. > Actually, I think you mean the copy-agent one. That has the correct dependency, as well as correctly uses the package() function, and not the build() function that the copy one does. And doesn't ln -s to programs in the /opt folder. -- Jonathan Arnold Webstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan
