On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 02:22:20 +0000, Vítor Miguel Miranda Ferreira <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess then I'll have to wait until you rename the package in order to > upload the renamed and rebuild source tarball. Right? > > > 2013/3/9 Vítor Miguel Miranda Ferreira <[email protected]> > > > Ah! Yes I intend to rename it. I just thought you had to delete the old > > one and create a new one with the new name. In this case its name would be > > rosa-media-player-develop-git. > > > > > > 2013/3/9 Federico Cinelli <[email protected]> > > > >> On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 01:46:11 +0000, Vítor Miguel Miranda Ferreira > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Greetings! > >> > I hereby request that the rosa-media-player-git [1] package be deleted, > >> > since I intend to replace it by a similar package derived from the > >> develop > >> > branch of the rosa-media-player upstream git repo. This one seems to > >> > contain a true bleeding edge version of this application, while the > >> master > >> > branch (the one reflected in [1]) only contains a minor changes > >> compared to > >> > the latest stable version. > >> > > >> > Signed, Dominor. > >> > > >> > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rosa-media-player-git/ > >> > >> Once you've built the new package just up update this one. Or if you plan > >> on > >> renaming it, let me know. > >> > >> -- > >> Federico Cinelli <[email protected]> > >> Arch Linux Trusted User (cinelli) > >> GnuPG Key: 0xC6C11350 > >> "Stay true." > >> > > > > Or you could keep both the git and devel version active on the aur. Since I'd imagine that one would be more "stable" than the other?
-- Federico Cinelli <[email protected]> Arch Linux Trusted User (cinelli) GnuPG Key: 0xC6C11350 "Stay true."
pgpxi2fP8w00P.pgp
Description: PGP signature
