On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Daniel Wallace <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 06:08:36PM +0200, D. Can Celasun wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Daniel Wallace < > [email protected] > > > wrote: > > > > > "D. Can Celasun" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >Greetings, > > > > > > > >I'm the maintainer of "limbo" [1] and the maintainer of "limbo_wine" > > > >[2] > > > >approached me and wants to merge our packages, which is fine by me. > > > > > > > >Can someone please merge both packages under the name "limbo" but > using > > > >the > > > >tarball and having the maintainer of "limbo_wine"? > > > > > > > >Thanks, > > > >Can > > > > > > > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59673 > > > >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59799 > > > > > > It doesn't work that way, the package name comes from the pkgbuild in > the > > > tarball. He needs to disown limbo for this to happen > > > -- > > > Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > > > > > > > > > I'm the owner of "limbo" and I have now disowned it. Does that work? > you want it to have the tarball from limbo? or limbo_wine? > -- > Daniel Wallace > Archlinux Trusted User (gtmanfred) > Georgia Institute of Technology > The tarball from limbo_wine. The only thing that needs to be preserved from limbo is the comments.
