On 16 March 2012 20:55, Det <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mar 16, 2012 14:55, "Alexander Rødseth" <rodseth at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The current maintainer, taylorchu, replied: >> > 1. it uses no gconf, so you dont need gtk3. >> > 2. it does not try to move and symlink. it is vanilla as provided > by google. >> >> Do you still request the package to be deleted? > > Well, the symlinks can be removed as they are unnecessary nowadays (the > man page and the .desktop _should_ still be installed), while 'no-gconf' > could just as well be manually installed from the AUR beforehand, as it > replaces 'gconf'. > > Building 'openssl098' is the only thing that might bother some people. > It could be moved to optional dependencies, since not everybody uses the > built-in Pepper Flash anyway (which requires it). > > At the _very least_, if this package was to be kept in the AUR (which I > disagree with) the name should be changed to something like > 'google-chrome-dev-no-gconf'. But using the same logic every single > package in the AUR depending on 'gconf' could be cloned with '-no-gconf' > alternatives. > > Is _this_ what we want? > > Det
I'll remove google-chrome-mini when the google-chrome-dev get's updated with the changes you mentioned. Lukas
