On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Keshav P R <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 20:34, Keshav P R <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 19:50, Keshav P R <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> Please delete elilo-git >>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45565 . It uses my own git >>> mirror of upstram cvs repo as source (no elilo-cvs package). I have >>> created elilo-x86_64 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56750 >>> to replace it, which uses upstream release tarballs. Thanks in >>> advance. >>> >>> Regards. >>> >>> Keshav >> >> Also delete grub-legacy-efi-fedora >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47979 , replaced by >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56751 . >> >> - Keshav > > bump^2
The reason nobody is willing to do this is probably because your package is obviously badly named (elilo-x86_64). There is no reason to name the package so. If it is x86_64 only, just put only x86_64 in arch=() instead of any, and just name the package "elilo". If instead x86_64 is a build-only requirement, you should still name the package as just "elilo" and leave the compile time check that you did already put in place. Either way I don't see a valid reason to name it elilo-x86_64, but if you think we missed something, please clarify. Thanks.
