2012/1/11 Bartłomiej Piotrowski <[email protected]> > On 01/08/2012 12:11 PM, Luca Bennati wrote: > > This is the context: > > gle (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1863) is outdated and > > orphaned. I prepared a new PKGBUILD, but then I found those other > packages > > on AUR: > > gle-graphics (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31267) also > > outdated but not orphaned > > gle4 (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12162) outdated, > orphaned > > and a clear dup > > > > Now, while it is clear that gle4 should be removed or at least merged, I > > would like to ask which package between gle and gle-graphics would be > > merged in the other. > > Upstream site names it 'GLE', but in some part of the tarball it's called > > 'gle-graphics'. > > What is the official stance? > > I've merged gle4 botes with gle. > Gle-graphics doesn't seem to be out-of-date for me. Anyway, I would keep > it in AUR, if it isn't part of gle package.
Sorry, it seems I wasn't clear with my explanation: gle and gle-graphics are the same project, I was asking which was considered the upstream name. I guess you could just merge gle with gle-graphics and be done with it.
