2011/10/21 Ionut Biru <[email protected]>: > On 10/21/2011 11:00 AM, Massimiliano Torromeo wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Gaetan Bisson<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> [2011-10-21 08:45:46 +0200] Dieter Plaetinck: >>>> >>>> On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:50:31 +0200 >>>> Sven-Hendrik Haase<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'd like to see nexuiz replaced by xonotic in [community]. Problem is >>>>> that nexuiz is still a fairly popular package despite being dead >>>>> upstream. xonotic devs recommend dropping nexuiz in favor of xonotic. >>>>> Technically, xonotic does not replace nexuiz because its gameplay is >>>>> somewhat different. >>>>> >>>>> I'd like some opinions on this. >>>> >>>> hi, imho: >>>> different game -> additional package >>>> nexuiz still popular -> keep package as is. >>> >>> My two cents: I'm of those who believe that we can't keep throwing 1GB >>> packages in the repos like there's no tomorrow. So if nexuiz and xonotic >>> are quite similar, it makes sense to only package one of them and save >>> the extra gigabyte for a different game. >>> >>> -- >>> Gaetan >>> >> >> I think that's the wrong reason for choosing to keep only one of the >> two packages. >> If the sizes of the packages are problematic that's a different issue. >> >> That said, being nexuiz a dead project may be a good enough reason to >> remove it. >> If not for that I would keep them both. > > i say to remove all games :D >
+1000 oh yeah, no kidding here :) > -- > Ionuț > -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Developer / Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com
