On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Max Roder <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > rafael ff1 wrote on 09/28/2011 04:12 PM: > >> It seems that the requester is the maintainer. >> >> IMHO, if the package can't be updated to newer version with python >> support, should not be flagged as out-of-date. > > You're absolutly right. I am the maintainer (sorry, forgot to mention > that) and the package indeed is up-to-date, as it's the latest version > supporting python. But, as the only package depending on > python-libchamplain *was* kismon, and this dependency was dropped, it's > useless (and probably will never be used again, as it *does not support > python* in any current version). > > The package was added in one turn with kismon [1], which, as said, does > not depend on it anymore. So I suggest deleting it. The current version > of libchamplain can be found in extra [2]. > > Max > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40968 > [2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/libchamplain/ > >
Now I got it, thanks. Deleted.
