On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 8:20 PM, jesse jaara <[email protected]> wrote: > Upsated some might find the implementation in AUR more appealing than the > one in repo. The is nothing that prevents people from uploading stuff to AUR > just cuz it has same features as the repo package. No, us. AUR is not a space where everybody can do what they wants. There is rules, TUs and community are here to keep it as clean as possible.
> Like example there > are/were many -pulse packases in aur that simply add pulse support to the > repo package. > This is not the point. I needs cairo-xcb which enable xcb support in cairo (from repo) to use awesome. Those cases seems to have sense to be in AUR. I don't see from what this package is different from extra one. If it's a duplication, there is no need to maintain it twice. That's my point. Regards, -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net
