On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Oon-Ee Ng <[email protected]> wrote: <snip> > Actually, after some consideration his naming is more appropriate, > since that's the name of the source tarball is gtalk-shared-status. I > would like my package renamed to that name, though I would not object > to deleting my package and leaving his one, as long as he can maintain > it. >
Ng, I'm not actually using the package. If you are, it's a much better deal if you maintain it, unless you're too busy with the rest of the universe.
