On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 8:57 PM, talki walki <[email protected]> wrote: > ruby-sqlite3: http://rubygems.org/gems/sqlite3 > sqlite3-ruby: http://rubygems.org/gems/sqlite3-ruby > > I don't think these two gems are the same one.
Sorry for double posting again... For the sake of completeness: I checked the AUR comments of ruby-sqlite3 and found this: > 'sqlite3-ruby' is now an empty placeholder gem that depends on 'sqlite3'. Nevertheless, I still believe a gem named `foo-ruby' can be completely different from a gem named `foo'. The convention should not make an exception just for gems with a -ruby suffix.
