On 2 March 2011 10:31, Isaac Dupree <[email protected]> wrote: > On 03/02/11 04:12, Anton Shestakov wrote: >> >> This package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36681 >> is orphaned, out-of-date and its ex-maintaier even asked for deletion >> in comments. > > Those aren't reasons to delete - except if I read the AUR comments > correctly, the maintainer-at-the-time (Citral) renamed toggl to > toggl-desktop, and that's why Citral said toggl should be deleted. (And > toggl-desktop to remain.) That's a valid reason to delete toggl, so yes a > TU should delete it. > > -Isaac >
Yep, thay seem to provide the same package. Moreover toggl points to non-existing sources. Lukas
