On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Thomas Dziedzic <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Thomas Dziedzic <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Laurent Carlier <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Le dimanche 19 décembre 2010 19:28:58, Thomas Dziedzic a écrit : >>>> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Xyne <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > On 2010-12-19 12:04 -0600 (50:7) >>>> > >>>> > Thomas Dziedzic wrote: >>>> >> I would like to move ibus-table-wubi [1][2] from community because it >>>> >> hasn't been updated since 27/12/2009 and it has been marked as >>>> >> deprecated upstream when you go to download it. I was just wanting >>>> >> feedback before I remove it. >>>> >> >>>> >> [1] - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/ibus-table-wubi/ >>>> >> [2] - >>>> >> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/ibus-table-wubi/ >>>> > >>>> > If it's marked as deprecated upstream then I think it should be removed. >>>> >>>> I would also like to remove >>>> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/ibus-sogoupycc/ >>>> since it has been deprecated in favor of a new package >>>> ibus-cloud-pinyin-svn which is in the AUR but I have no intentions of >>>> bringing the newer package into community. >>> >>> I agree about the two removals. There is also the case of emerald(-themes?) >>> that is replaced for a long date by compiz afaik. >>> >>> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/emerald/ >>> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/emerald-themes/ >>> >>> ++ >>> >> >> I think those 2 need a seperate discussion, and I wont remove them >> myself since I don't maintain them, so I don't know the story behind >> those 2. >> > > Removed both ibus-sogoupycc and ibus-table-wubi >
Moved to the AUR.
