On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 01.12.2010 00:11, PyroPeter wrote: > > On 11/30/2010 11:51 PM, Seblu wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Wanton<[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> bin32-zsnes > >>> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19167 > >>> Already in multilib. > >>> > >>> rocksndiamonds-fedora > >>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22418 > >>> Outdated, replaced by community/rocksndiamonds. > >>> > >>> dune2 > >>> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33037 > >>> Broken link, and this is non-free game. > >>> > >> In a general way, non-free game/soft is a valid argument? > > > > No. Afaik even the official repositorys contain non-free software. > > > Indeed, rms wouldn't be happy. Anyhow, if end up discussing the ethics > of non-free software we'll end up like Debian. Let's just let our users > choose what they want to use as long as providing the software isn't > illegal. > > Just fix the broken link or orphan the package and let somebody else > take over. > > -- Sven-Hendrik > Fix: as i know, its a commercial game.
