On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Thomas Dziedzic <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Seblu <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Thomas Dziedzic <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Seblu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> What's the difference between this and the kernel26-mainline package? >> Mainline follow the mailine, mine follow only rc. For example, i also >> have a kernel26-next. This give me the choice, at my computer start to >> choose an another kernel which is a release candidate, without be in >> redundant with kernel26 provided by arch developper. >> >>> kernel26-rc used to exist, but it was later renamed to >>> kernel26-mainline. So we should probably get rid of kernel26-rc also. >> Maybe. >> This was just a sharing of my work on my customs kernels packages. And >> if my previous argument was not revelent, i will not post it again. >> >> Regards, >> -- >> Sébastien Luttringer >> www.seblu.net >> > > The mainline *is* the rc. look it up on kernel.org > Currently yes.
You have not understand what i said. Maybe i was not clear. my rc, only follow kernel mainline when it's tagged as a releasae candidate. So my kernel will never have a 2.6.37 version for example. Mailine will. But, to save you from a visceral reaction to the sight of this packet, i will continue to use this packet for me after deletion :) Regards, -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net
