Probably if somebody updated the package to the latest version, I would think it would end up being the same as mysql in the official mysql package.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:53 AM, jwbirdsong < [email protected]> wrote: > On 09/13/2010 09:39 AM, J. W. Birdsong wrote: > > On 09/13/10 at 01:52pm, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: > >> On 13 September 2010 09:31, Nathan O <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Mysqle http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20376 appears to be > the same > >>> as mysql in the extra repositories. > >>> > >> > >> I see that there are some patches included atop the [extra] package. > >> The funny thing is that they are not included in the package. I guess > >> that it can be safely removed. Any opinion about this? > > > > I'm going under the ASSumption that the e in mysqle is for Extra (ie. the > patches) > > As it is patched above and beyond the extra version I'd vote for keeping. > > the above statement would apply only IF the patches are still valid when > tried to apply against current version (5.15.0) . (Didn't notice pkg was > flagged OOD until after I replied) > >
