On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 10:17 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote: > 2010/9/7 Ng Oon-Ee <[email protected]>: > > On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 08:17 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote: > >> 2010/9/6 Ng Oon-Ee <[email protected]>: > >> > On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 10:11 -0500, Brad Fanella wrote: > >> >> 2010/9/6 Sven-Hendrik Haase <[email protected]> > >> >> > >> >> > On 06.09.2010 08:42, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > >> >> > > On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 21:03 -0400, Loui Chang wrote: > >> >> > >> On Sun 05 Sep 2010 22:49 +0200, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > >> >> > >>> Arch TUs are generally considered to be the ultimate nightmare > >> >> of any > >> >> > >>> upstream maintainer. We come in the night, nagging with patches > >> >> until > >> >> > >>> all known upstream problems are fixed. > >> >> > >>> > >> >> > >>> Do not stop trying to get your patches into upstream. > >> >> > >> Hell yeah! > >> >> > >> > >> >> > > Sven-Hendrik's post should be plastered on the wall of every TU > >> >> (and > >> >> > > Arch user, actually) =) > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Any objections to putting the quote in its entirety on the wiki > >> >> for TUs? > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > None at all. :) > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> I was actually planning on making that my forum signature! :-P > >> >> However, that > >> >> is crucial information and needs to be included in the wiki. > >> > > >> > Done. May need polishing =) > >> > > >> > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_Guidelines#The_TU.27s_mission_statement > >> > >> Sorry, but however awesome Sven is, that kind of content does not fit > >> in that page. I have slightly changed the wording of the introductory > >> paragraph for the "desired effect"; see wiki diff. > > > > Understood =). The comment is still awesome though. Would it be > > acceptable for 'communicating with and sending patches upstream as > > needed' to contain a link to the ML post? > > Sure. In fact, since there are no other examples I can recall for the > sake of citation, that _was_ my intention (which somehow skipped my > keyboard).
Done. There seems to be a spacing issue on my browser after the link, is that standard?
