On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Heiko Baums <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am Sun, 5 Sep 2010 02:52:55 -0500 > schrieb Nathan O <[email protected]>: > > > At this time, I am going through the > > ophaned packages and updating them to the latest versions and > > adopting packages(in my opinion this helps AUR out). > > And this is why I don't think you should become a TU. Your deletion > mania was a bit too big. You asked for package deletion obviously > without reading the PKGBUILDs and other files in the packages and > without comparing packages enough. > > If you send a removal request to the mailing list as a normal user > then a TU can first make sure if a package can indeed be removed, but > if you were a TU then you could remove those packages by yourself > without asking another TU first. > > So I don't think you should be a TU until you proof that you learned > reading PKGBUILDs and that you deal with packages not owned by yourself > trustworthily. I don't see this, yet. > > And I don't want my packages be removed from AUR just because you think > they can be removed because of a pointless reason. See again your > removal request for alevt and alevt-dvb. Packages are not the same just > because a part of the package names is identical. > > Heiko > I can understand your concern about deletion and I will work on that area.
