On 16/02/2010, Christoph <[email protected]> wrote: > Please delete the packages ttf-adf: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24551 > and otf-adf: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34665 > > The first package (ttf-adf) is outdated, no activity for 11 months. I wrote > an > e-mail to the maintainer because I asked him to update or orphan the > package, > but he has not responded for four weeks. > > I wanted to adopt the package, but meanwhile I think that the package should > be renamed. I first thought that otf-adf would be an adequate name, but now > I > think that there should be the following three packages: > adffonts-otf - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34669 > adffonts-ttf - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34671 > adffonts-type1 - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34672 > > because *all* of the fonts are published as otf-fonts, a part of them > additionally as ttf, and another part of them additionally as type1.
The naming standard we've used has been ttf-foo, so naturally you should try to follow that. All three can be parts of the group "adf-fonts": ttf-adf otf-adf type1-adf -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD
