I agree, similar situation as chromium packages used to be, just waaay too many.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:36 AM, Stefan Husmann <[email protected]>wrote: > Nuno André Jeremias de Aniceto schrieb: > > In the AUR discussion forum, I (quarkup) proposed to make a cleanup on the >> opera packages. >> >> the forum topic is this and it is active: >> http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=84446 >> you may find some more of the details in the forum >> >> there is the "opera" package along with the following ones (as explained >> on the forum): >> >> aur/opera 10.01-1 >> aur/opera-b1 10.10-1 >> aur/opera-beta 10.10-10 >> aur/opera-beta-qt4 10.00b3-1 (Out of Date) >> aur/opera-bundled 10.01-3 >> aur/opera-dev 10.10_4694-1 >> aur/opera-devel-qt4 10.10_4685-1 (Out of Date) >> aur/opera-dev-qt4 10.00_4493-2 (Out of Date) >> aur/opera-g4 LATEST-3 >> aur/opera-qt3 9.64-1 >> aur/opera-qt4 10.00-6 (Out of Date) >> aur/opera-shared-b1 10.10-1 >> aur/opera-static 9.64-1 (Out of Date) >> aur/opera-unite-devel-qt3 10.00_4440-3 (Out of Date) >> >> many of these packages are out of date or are duplicateds. >> Please check the proposal on the forum. >> >> > Hello, > > opera-beta-qt4 was deleted, because it was orphaned and a duplicate. The > author requested deletion in the comments. > > Please, if you are interested, read the forum thread. An Opera employee is > doing delightfull comments there. > > Regards Stefan >
