On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote:
> > My guess is that it is because we tend to associate huge numbers of > packages with not enough time to maintain them and thus lower quality > (something I had discussed with him earlier). So I believe this to be more > of an optimizing the changes of being a TU rather than a reassessment of > priorities. Orphaning the several hundred vim plugins/themes only a couple > of weeks after putting them there is a bit weird. > > I don't vote on TU matters anymore, but I will put this out there. The > recent spike in Laszlo's activities leads me to be concerned about longevity > and some accuracy in his original application. He claims to be using Arch > for ~1 1/2 years. But it was only two moths ago I saw him on IRC asking > some fairly basic questions about pacman features and what was the > equivalent to doing some emerge (Gentoo) operations. Two months also > corresponds to his here registered on the forums. That concerns me, but I > could be entirely wrong here. > > Allan > > Hello Allan! 1. This is a reassessment, really. I didn't know which time I will apply when I disowned those packages, so it's not a TU application related matter. I won't get those packages again after this application :) Well, I've just considered the suggestions from experienced TUs, not to maintain so much packages, but in better quality. This is my main purpose. 2. I've used earlier #archlinux.hu, Hungarian Archlinux IRC channel, and the Hungarian Unix Portal. You're right, I wasn't active on those sites some monthes/year ago. In that time I didn't deal with equivalent solution to do emerge operations. I wanted to know this super distribution, and hungarian archlinux community, and users. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp
