On Thu 23 Jul 2009 22:04 +0530, Abhishek Dasgupta wrote: > 2009/7/23 Roman Kyrylych <[email protected]>: > > This is absolutely no-go because this way bugtracker will be flooded > > with out-of date messages > > that have no useful information. > > Agreed. The web interface is the best place to mark out-of-date. For > now, people can send to the maintainer directly. > > > +1 for complete merging community into main website (with limited > > permissions for TUs) > > and removing community-related part of AUR > > (with a notice that if there was some important info in comments - > > it should be reported as bugs or it will be lost) > > This information could be kept archived somewhere. A simple HTML dump > of the all the community package pages would suffice.
Well, I won't remove the packages outright. I'll just dummify them so they won't appear in the AUR. Any particular reason that you'd want to archive it though?
