Why not just rename it java-gstreamer-java? That way we can respect the archlinux policies, and also keep the origal name for anyone trying to find it on the aur.
2009/6/23 Andrei Thorp <[email protected]>: > Excerpts from Vitaliy Berdinskikh's message of Tue Jun 23 16:06:28 -0400 2009: >> В Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:39:55 +0200 >> Andrea Scarpino <[email protected]> пишет: >> >> > On 23/06/2009, Vitaliy Berdinskikh <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > The original name is gstreamer-java >> > But we have the policies, so if you want to package a project respect >> > ours policies. >> > please adopt java-gstreamer; after this, someone will delete >> > gstreamer-java >> > >> >> " >> * If a Java library has a generic name, the package name should be >> prepended with the title java- to help distinguish it from other >> libraries. This is not necessary with uniquely named packages (like >> JUnit), end-user programs (like Eclipse), or libraries that can be >> uniquely described with another prefix (like >> jakarta-commons-collections or apache-ant). > > I'd say that gstreamer-java is a generically named library, so it should > probably be java-gstreamer. > > Thanks for clearing it up. > -- > Andrei Thorp, Developer: Xandros Corp. (http://www.xandros.com) > > Q: What's the big deal about rm, I have been deleting stuff for years? And > never lost anything.. oops! > A: ... > -- From the Frequently Unasked Questions >
