-----Original Message----- > Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:16:28 +0100 > Subject: [aur-general] Bad packages in AUR > From: Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" >
> Please see these packages, it contains a builded packages, binaries > and some sources. > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14252 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20933 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4011 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17880 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8064 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=199 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5338 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14866 > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=199 > > ...and there are many more. > > I am preparing another list, but much more extensive. But first I have > a question: in unsupported the packages.tar.gz may contain "tarballs" > of the sources?, because I see that there are several that have this? > (some are a mistake of the user that uploaded that and in array of > source download of the homepage) In the AUR Guidelines there is no > reference to this. > > > > -- > Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) > http://www.djgera.com.ar > KeyID: 0x1B8C330D > Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D > > Hello, findwild was mine, I did a fresh upload, that fixed it. I deleted micq (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7928) because last update was 2006 and the maintainer did not respond to the comments of several users (program was renamed to climm). For the other packages I left a comment. The AUR comment page looks strange. Where I expect the comment button, there is the word "poop". http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20933 is okay, there are only small files uploaded. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14252 is okay, too. Thank you for notification. Regards Stefan
