On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:38:22AM -0800, Olivier Duclos wrote: > So yesterday I was looking if someone had already made a pkgbuild for the rar > archiver. I typed 'rar' in the search engine and got 1224 matches. Since rar > wasn't at the top of the results, I thought it didn't exist and created it > under the name 'rar-official'. > > And this morning, I receive a message telling me there is already a pkgbuild > for rar. *Sigh* Now, I agree that I could have searched a little longer, but > that doesn't change the fact that the search engine is too basic and should > at least show the exact match in first position. That's not a bad suggestion.
Just for future reference: If you look closer you'll notice that search results are arranged alphabetically by package name by default. You'd just need to navigate to the Rs and you should have found rar.
