On 9/14/2012 1:16 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Good to hear. Since I don't use Biber (at least not yet), it would be
very cool if someone could check if the documentation needs to be
complemented.
I took a quick look and saw two things.
1. doc/tex-ref.tex has to be updated. In addition to the obvious stuff
at the beginning (version, date,...), I suggest something like the
following:
--- tex-ref.tex.~1.26.~ 2010-02-21 07:22:14.000000000 -0500
+++ tex-ref.tex 2012-09-14 14:55:46.549469600 -0400
@@ -259,6 +259,7 @@
\key{Appropriate previewer}{View}
\key{Print the output}{Print}
\key{Bib\TeX}{BibTeX}
+\key{Biber}{Biber}
\key{MakeIndex}{Index}
\key{LaCheck}{Check}
\key{Make (PostScript) File}{File}
(Or should the second 'Biber' be '\star Biber'? I don't really
understand the significance of the star.)
2. Somewhere we should mention the variable LaTeX-always-use-Biber.
Here's one possibility, but maybe there's a better place:
--- auctex.texi.~1.310.~ 2012-08-17 02:59:49.000000000 -0400
+++ auctex.texi 2012-09-14 15:20:13.595379900 -0400
@@ -105,6 +105,13 @@
@AUCTeX{}, see @ref{Top,,Introduction,preview-latex,The @previewlatex{}
Manual}.
+If you use the biblatex package, you may want to put the following in
+your @file{.emacs} file:
+
+@lisp
+(setq LaTeX-always-use-Biber t)
+@end lisp
+
There is a mailing list for general discussion about @AUCTeX{}: write a
mail with ``subscribe'' in the subject to
@email{auctex-request@@gnu.org} to join it. Send contributions to
Ken
_______________________________________________
auctex mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
