Marcus Frings <[email protected]> writes: >> So Biber users, could you please try applying the attached patch >> against AUCTeX from CVS and check if the Biber stuff also works as >> expected? > > The patch file applied cleanly to my CVS version. At the moment I'm > working with it and everything seems to be fine. If I found a weird > behaviour or a bug I'll report it here!
Great. My main problem when compiling that patch was that there were a lot of differences between Philips files and the AUCTeX CVS version that didn't look Biber-related. Maybe that were general improvements and fixes of the AUCTeX code, or maybe it was just an older AUCTeX version he worked on. Since I couldn't judge that, I preferred the stock AUCTeX versions in those cases. Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
