Dear Ralf,
Am 04.07.2007 um 23:12 schrieb Ralf Angeli:
Judging by the general quality (again: I have only scratched the
surface of all the beautiful and powerful features) of a reportedly
mature tool like AUCTeX this must be the case - because otherwise
people would have that kind of problem all the time.
It's likely more a case of people not using the feature.
This touches the last question of my previous posting: so
(experienced?) users of AUCTeX simply have other (better?) ways of
debugging their TeX code than using TeX-next-error? - It seems to me,
going through the log and fixing errors and warnings is such a
routine thing that it pays off to make that less painful and more
efficient?
Stefan
--
Dr. Stefan Vollmar, Dipl.-Phys.
Max-Planck-Institut für neurologische Forschung
Gleuelerstr. 50, 50931 Köln, Germany
Tel.: +49-221-4726-213 FAX +49-221-4726-298
Tel.: +49-221-478-5713 Mobile: 0173-5340707
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nf.mpg.de
_______________________________________________
auctex mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
