David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Actually, I was of the impression that MikTeX contained some kpse* > compatibility tools of dubious quality and partly incompatible > options.
There is a kpsewhich.exe but I don't understand how it can be used to find the texmf roots: ,----[ Output of kpsewhich -help ] | This program tries to locate a TeXMF related file. | | Options: | -alias=APP Pretend to be APP. | -help Print this help screen and exit. | -file-type=FILETYPE Use the search path for FILETYPE. | -must-exist Make sure the file exists; run the package | installer if necessary. | -show-path=FILETYPE Show the search path for FILETYPE. | -start Start associated program if file was found. | -version Print the version number and exit. `---- > Could you try through the available tools and suggest one which could > be used to produce the correct output? If you call "initexmf --report" you get approx. 14 kB of configuration infos. The output includes: ,----[ taken from initexmf --report output ] | TeXMF Roots | =========== | | #0: -ld C:\programme\localtexmf | #1: i-d C:\programme\texmf | (i=install root; l=local root; d=fndb exists) `---- If needed I can send you the full output. >> Aaah, yes - one thing: (require 'tex-mik) no longer works. Emacs >> reports something like 'unable to load tex-mik.el'. However both >> tex-mik.el and tex-mik.elc reside under $PREFIX/site-lisp/auctex. > > Which is out of the load-path. Hm. Good that you reported this. Actually I don't have any instructions in my config files to include \site-lisp and \site-lisp\auctex in the lisp search path. It always worked without. In 11.55, tex-mik.elc is also in the /auctex directory (as you know, of course) and with 11.55 (require 'tex-mik) works - in the current snapshot it doesn't. Hmmmh ... -- Uwe _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
