Edward O'Connor wrote:
Robert Sayre wrote:
Don't move forward with the autodiscovery draft.
[...]
At this point there seems to be no reason for the autodiscovery draft
to exist, since the WHAT-WG has ably covered the subject in Web
Applications 1.0.
I am worried that there are three simultaneous efforts to spec out feed
autodiscovery: WA1, the RSS board's recent spec, and this draft. Ideally
this stuff would get specced just once. WHAT WG seems like a neutral
ground, syndication-format wise, so perhaps they're best positioned to
spec feed autodiscovery in a way that makes everybody happy.
+1 to speccing this through the WHAT-WG. I'm sure Ian would be happy to
address any concerns brought up by this community.
~fantasai
