That "bucket" already exists in the form of the app:control element.
<entry>
...
<x:foo />
...
<app:control>
...
<x:bar />
...
</app:control>
</entry>
- James
Eric Scheid wrote:
> [snip]
> We did at one time discuss providing a bucket container specifically for the
> latter, with the assumption that extensions outside the bucket are data
> elements meant for publication. Having a bucket container would make life
> simpler for server implementations -- just store everything as an xml blob,
> the same as they do for atom:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Lisa, would that help?
>
> e.
>
>
>
