Hey Jan, No, the text should read "a subsequent version".
Also, keep in mind that this draft was put out there for purely experimental purposes. It hasn't been updated and likely won't be unless there is significant interest. - James Jan Algermissen wrote: > [snip] > James > > quick question about your draft: > > You write: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > 13. The 'next-revision' Link Relation > > Atom entry elements MAY contain an atom:link element with a rel > attribute value of 'next-revision' whose href attribute specifies the > URI of an Atom Entry Document representing the subsequent version of > the entry. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Is there an intention behind the use of the phrase '*the* subsequent > version' to rule out version trees (where next-revision would point to > *a* subsequent revision of potentially many)? > > Thanks, > Jan > > > > > >> >> --Thomas Broyer >> > >
