Hey Sylvain, On this one, I'm being very serious. I need to know what "conformance" means. Hiding the div completely from users of Abdera would mean potentially losing important data (e.g. the div may contain an xml:lang or xml:base) or forcing me to perform additional processing (pushing the in-scope xml:lang/xml:base down to child elements of the div. It also has ease-of-use ramifications on the API. So I really do need a solid answer on this one.
- James Sylvain Hellegouarch wrote: >> On 6/27/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Please define "conformance" in regards to this test. That is, what is >>> the exact behavior that a library must perform when a code library has >>> an API like, "getContent" on the content element. >>> >>> e.g., is a parser not conformant if it passes the DIV on to the >>> consuming application with the expectation that the application is >>> responsible for "doing the right thing" with it? >> Don't be dense. Would the parser be conformant if it passed on the >> feed, entry, and div elements with that expectation? I'll file a bug >> on UFP and I bet you it'll get fixed without a question, because there >> won't be a bad-faith interpretation to fight. That's two demerits this >> week for you. Tsk tsk. >> > > Could this teasing please stop? It noises the debate and starts being > *really* annoying for all of us. If you two have issues, do that in > private as this is not the right place. > > Thanks, > - Sylvain >
