The feedvalidator really does need a "ValidButPositivelyIdiotic" warning.
- James Eric Scheid wrote: > On 22/4/06 10:53 AM, "James M Snell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Where that gets nasty, of course, is when the href >> is relative and xml:base is being used to set the Base URI. Publisher >> would need to make sure that the href/ref combo match up properly > > Would this be considered a "match"? > > <link rel="replies" > href="comments" > xml:base="/06/04/21/blah/" /> > <thr:count ref="/06/04/21/blah/comments" > updated="...">5</thr:count> > > You just know there'll be a few idiots that will try that on. > > e. > >
