James M Snell wrote:
So, with that, let me go ahead and open it up to a vote with the
caveat that votes from folks with concrete plans to implement the
spec will carry more weight so I'd appreciate a heads up.
1. Do I change <in-reply-to id="..." /> to <in-reply-to ref="..." />?
+1. (Just for the record and in case I haven't made it on James' yet)
and.. to address David's concerns about extending atom:link...
2. Do I change thr:count and thr:when to extension elements instead
of attributes on atom:link?
-0. Given that the whole s/id/ref/ discussion was only about a cosmetic
change and that David's <ex:linkinfo> workaround syntax is plain ugly, I
would rather see Atom Extension Attributes standardized, then having to
resort to something like <ex:linkinfo>. If only atom:link were extensible...
Regards,
Andreas Sewe
