Well, my faxes passes through asterisk successfully, however I still have some problems about fax reception by rxfax.

The softfax answers, and negotiates transmission, however then as some stage of communiation something is wrong.
But I have nothing more but this log:

Jun 2 00:10:21 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:4242 zt_read: DTMF digit: * on Zap/10-1 Jun 2 00:10:22 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:4242 zt_read: DTMF digit: 1 on Zap/10-1 Jun 2 00:10:22 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:4242 zt_read: DTMF digit: 0 on Zap/10-1 Jun 2 00:10:22 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:4242 zt_read: DTMF digit: 7 on Zap/10-1 Jun 2 00:10:23 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:4242 zt_read: DTMF digit: 8 on Zap/10-1 Jun 2 00:10:23 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:1384 zt_enable_ec: No echocancellation requested
   -- Executing SetVar("Zap/10-1", "CALLEDFAX=*1078") in new stack
   -- Executing Answer("Zap/10-1", "") in new stack
Jun 2 00:10:23 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:2484 zt_answer: Took Zap/10-1 off hook
   -- Executing Goto("Zap/10-1", "fax|*1078|1") in new stack
   -- Goto (fax,*1078,1)
   -- Executing Macro("Zap/10-1", "faxreceive") in new stack
-- Executing SetVar("Zap/10-1", "FAXFILE=/var/spool/asterisk/fax/*1078/asterisk-419-1117663820.32") in new stack -- Executing RxFAX("Zap/10-1", "/var/spool/asterisk/fax/*1078/asterisk-419-1117663820.32.tif") in new stack Jun 2 00:10:37 DEBUG[16900]: app_rxfax.c:80 phase_e_handler: ============================================================================== Jun 2 00:10:37 DEBUG[16900]: app_rxfax.c:81 phase_e_handler: Fax successfully received. Jun 2 00:10:37 DEBUG[16900]: app_rxfax.c:82 phase_e_handler: Remote station id: Jun 2 00:10:37 DEBUG[16900]: app_rxfax.c:83 phase_e_handler: Local station id: Jun 2 00:10:37 DEBUG[16900]: app_rxfax.c:84 phase_e_handler: Pages transferred: 0 Jun 2 00:10:37 DEBUG[16900]: app_rxfax.c:85 phase_e_handler: Image resolution: 0 x 0 Jun 2 00:10:37 DEBUG[16900]: app_rxfax.c:86 phase_e_handler: Transfer Rate: 9600 Jun 2 00:10:37 DEBUG[16900]: app_rxfax.c:87 phase_e_handler: ============================================================================== Jun 2 00:10:41 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:3974 __zt_exception: Exception on 28, channel 10 Jun 2 00:10:41 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:3286 zt_handle_event: Got event On hook(1) on channel 10 (index 0) -- Executing System("Zap/10-1", "/var/lib/asterisk/scripts/mailfax "*1076" "*1078" "" "" "/var/spool/asterisk/fax/*1078/asterisk-419-1117663820.32" """) in new stack Jun 2 00:10:41 WARNING[16900]: app_system.c:70 system_exec_helper: Unable to execute '/var/lib/asterisk/scripts/mailfax "*1076" "*1078" "" "" "/var/spool/asterisk/fax/*1078/asterisk-419-1117663820.32" ""' Jun 2 00:10:41 WARNING[16900]: app_system.c:70 system_exec_helper: Unable to execute '/var/lib/asterisk/scripts/mailfax "*1076" "*1078" "" "" "/var/spool/asterisk/fax/*1078/asterisk-419-1117663820.32" ""'
 == Spawn extension (fax, h, 1) exited non-zero on 'Zap/10-1'
Jun 2 00:10:41 DEBUG[445]: rate_engine.c:708 poster_worker: Rating Engine poster thread processing Jun 2 00:10:41 DEBUG[445]: rate_engine.c:770 poster_worker: Attempting to write queue entry to database Jun 2 00:10:41 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:2164 zt_hangup: Hangup: channel: 10 index = 0, normal = 28, callwait = -1, thirdcall = -1 Jun 2 00:10:41 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:2577 zt_setoption: Set option TDD MODE, value: OFF(0) on Zap/10-1 Jun 2 00:10:41 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:1352 update_conf: Updated conferencing on 10, with 0 conference users
   -- Hungup 'Zap/10-1'

Asterisk 1.0.7-BRIstuffed-0.2.0-RC7k
libspandsp-dev 0.0.2pre17-1
libspandsp0    0.0.2pre17-1
txfax/rxfax from spandsp-0.0.2pre18

Physical test fax is Panasonic KX-FT908PD connected to TDM400P FXS port

I also tried incomming fax through BRI interface - the same result, error code 41 (on Panasonic)


Maybe someone meet this problem ?

Regards
Marcin
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to