On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 05:32:49PM -0800, Lee Howard wrote: > Quite right. I'm sorry to have misled. > > What happens is this (as an example scenario): > > The receiver will, for an example, receive the post-page message. The > sender expects a response to this. The receiver, however, is required > to wait between 55 and 95 ms before transmitting the response. The > sender will likely be looking for the post-page response immediately > after transmitting the post-page message. Per spec the sender will > only wait about 3 seconds (per-spec between 2550 and 3450 ms) before > giving up wating and retransmitting the post-page message (and then > re-expecting the response).
Thank you. So the 1 second lag I suggested is too much, but the principle is sound. Say we change it to half a second you're well under the limit. The question then becomes, is a fixed half-a-second jitterbuffer good enough to remove all the problematic jitter from the signal. This is a testable assertion (though unfortunatly I don't have the necessary equipment), simulating jitter is possible and hopefully the jitterbuffer itself is tunable. A tunable jitterbuffer sounds like a good idea, anyone actually thinking of implementing it though? Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout Ecomtel Pty Ltd _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
