On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:40:24PM -0600, Matthew Boehm wrote: > > wrong withe the SPA-2100. The only thing the SPA-2100 (still) lacks is > > a "bridge mode", where the LAN and WAN ports would act just like a > > switch, so that you can easily chain devices without routing/NAT. Just > > like most IP phones do. > > So what happens if you try and chain a bunch of SPA-2100s? Does the 2100 > act more like a router? >
The SPA-2100 will perform NAT between the LAN and WAN ports. It means that you won't be able to connect to devices "behind" SPA-2100 from the WAN side (except by configuring DMZ, but it's gets awful then). It also means that you can't chain them with their basic config, because it won't like having the same network address (192.168.1.x) on both its interfaces. So right now, if you want to chain them, you have to play with IP addresses, DHCP settings, etc. Not fun, particularly when you consider that this device is really "plug and play", it remotes configure everything. Hopefully a "bridge" mode will appear in a later firmware upgrade (which, for Sipuras, are frequent and readily available on their website). -- Nicolas Bougues _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
