Hi Dean,
What relevance has that to what we were discussing? We were talking about free form speech to text. That is a world apart from a voice activated IVR. Besides that, I have never found a voice activated IVR in English that gets better than about 30% accuracy on a fairly limited decision. A slight divergence from the typical 98% they claim. In contrast, I have seen very good accuracy for Cantonese and Mandarin, which have been less intensively developed.
Regards, Steve
dean collins wrote:
Disagree with you Matt.
Check out www.angel.com
If anyone wants some contacts over there email me. I'm sure they would be happy to set up on API for utilizing their services in conjunction with asterisk.
Cheers, Dean
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Klein Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 11:44 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Speech Recognition
Agreed, Steve. Iq, Maybe it is for your voice, but speech to text is a long ways away from being as advanced as you think it is. Check out
dragon speek, and see what it takes to train a voice...
-m
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:
cameIqbal wrote:
Hi
I dont know jack about speech recognition, however since this topic
itup anyonw know how spinvox do speech ercognition, in fact its so good
aconverst the speech to text and sends the voicemail as a SMS, I think
AIf it works really well, there is probably a human operator involved.awesome addone to the sms module in asterisk.
number of systems that try to look automated actually rely on human operators.
Regards,
Steve
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
