> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Boehlke > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 2:20 PM > To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Single or Dual Processor? High volume MeetMe > > On Intel it is our experience that the constraint is the PC bus. > Throughput > tops out at somewhere between 50 and 100 calls depending on disk speed, > without ever using a meaningful part of one processor. > > William Boehlke > Signate > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Spencer > Nassar > Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 11:21 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Single or Dual Processor? High volume MeetMe > > > Has anyone benchmarked Asterisk on a dedicated single versus dual > processor machine? Or could any Asterisk developers comment on whether > it is architected in such a way that threads could run on multiple CPUs > (especially MeetMe2)? > > At a higher level, can I host more simultaneous lines and/or > conferences for MeetMe if I use a dual processor machine versus single? > Also, any info on memory use with high numbers of conference users > (100, 1000)? > > Thanks! >
Has anyone done any testing with the Apple X Serve G5 (http://www.apple.com/ca/xserve/) or Sun (http://www.sun.com/servers/entry/v20z/index.jsp) Sun Fire machines? I would think that something like the Apple could handle the IO a lot better. Geoff _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
