On Thursday 27 January 2005 21:14, Brian Capouch wrote: > Bob Goddard wrote: > > No, everyone should go what ever they are more comfortable with. > > If the code does not have support for a certain database and a > > user would like it, then why not have it in? The database specific > > code should be as abstract as possible to allow this, perhaps being > > written in its own little library. > > Sorry, I should have been much plainer I guess: > > What's wrong with ODBC?
Was this not discussed here or on the dev list? I have only used it once, but was not a complaint of it is that it is rather limited? I would always rather go native. Developers tend to ensure a native interface works first before any other. B _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
