|
What
do you want to test? Call
routing under certain failure scenarios or CAMA trunking? We
tested 911 to a “PRI” not connected to the PSTN that terminates on
another gateway (back to back PRI) and make a dedicated handset ring using a
dedicated pass through dial-peer. That way you can do the Q931 debugging on the
far end gateway to make sure you have all the right ISDN signaling in place
(assuming you are using ISDN, which makes sense if you are an office PBX) CAMA trunking will require…. CAMA trunks… As for
911 design… there are a number of ways of doing
this depending on the hazard/failure you are trying to protect yourself from. You
could go as far as dedicated 911 IADs using, for
instance, Cisco’s SRST and if you are using IP Phones, set up the SRST
gateway as the secondary call manager etc etc etc. -----Original Message----- I believe the 911 is a serious issue if one does an asterisk
installation in an office. How do you test 911? Won’t they arrest you or
something for dialing 911 for no reason and talking to one of their agents who
could have taken a more important call? On the other hand what an emergency comes up (like someone
got seriously injured) and on top of that asterisk crashed all of a sudden
bringing the whole office PBX down. Since it would be not be possible to place
a call and emergency matter becomes more serious, who would be held
responsible? The person who installed the PBX for not implementing a redundant
and reliable system? |
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
