I have never had an issue with 2.6.9 with asterisk. bkw
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Scobie > Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 2:00 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Return of experience : Asterisk more > stablewith 2.6 or 2.4 > > Jeremy SALMON wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Just a question, > > > > For you, what is the more reliable kernel for an asterisk prod > > server... > > > The following 2 recent quotes from kernel developers may be worth > considering when making your decision: > > After 2.6.9-ac its clear that the long 2.6.9 process worked very > badly. While 2.6.10 is looking much better its long period meant the > allegedly "official" base kernel was a complete pile of insecure donkey > turd for months. That doesn't hurt most vendor users but it does hurt > those trying to do stuff on the base kernels very badly. > > -- Alan Cox > > Not all 2.6.x kernels will be good; but if we do releases every 1 or 2 > weeks, some of them *will* be good. The problem with the -rc releases is > that we try to predict in advance which releases in advance will be > stable, and we don't seem to be able to do a good job of that. If we do > a release every week, my guess is that at least 1 in 3 releases will > turn out to be stable enough for most purposes. But we won't know until > after 2 or 3 days which releases will be the good ones. > > -- Ted Ts'o > > Regards, > > Richard > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
