Thanks for your replies. I'd read somewhere that the n priority was "after 1.0" but I now understand that this means "after 1.0 and subsequent stable patches". Thanks again and I shall download HEAD.
Bill Seddon -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Fineberg Sent: January 08, 2005 2:38 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] New 'n' priority Christopher L. Wade wrote: > Bill Seddon wrote: > >> Can anyone point me to documentation covering the new 'n' priority. >> I've >> downloaded and have working v1-0-2. But when I attempt to use the n >> priority - for example: >> >> exten => s,1(checkavail),ChanIsAvail(${EMERGENCY_TRUNK}) exten => >> s,n(dial),Dial(SIP/1001) >> >> Asterisk generates errors containing the text "pbx_load_module: Invalid >> priority". >> >> Can anyone help or show me what I'm doing wrong? >> >> Bill Seddon > > > 'n' and 's' as well as labels only work in CVS HEAD, its not in any of > the 'stable' versions. > > -Chris > Well I'm using v1.0.3 and previously v1.0.2 and they certainly know about 's'. Haven't tried 'n' yet. Adam _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
